In brief
Queensland's Department for Housing and Public Works has released details of fundamental amendments to the Building and Construction Industry Payments Act, proposed to come into effect this year. Partner Dan Young and Overseas Practitioner Andrew Middleton report on the key reforms proposed and their implications should they be enacted in their current form.
How does it affect you?
- The changes will mean:
- both potential claimants and potential respondents need to be aware that different timeframes will apply to payment claims made under the Building and Construction Industry Payments Act 2004 (Qld) (the BCIPA), depending on the value and the nature of the claim;
- it will be even more important than at present to seek proper legal advice in relation to any claim, to ensure the applicable timescales are identified and met;
- when drafting and negotiating construction and related goods or services contracts, regard should be had to the possible effect of the new timescales on the times for things to occur under the contract (including payment certification); and
- industry participants should familiarise themselves with the new process for the appointment of adjudicators, to be administered centrally through the Queensland Building and Construction Commission (the QBCC).
Background to the reforms
In December 2012, the Minister for Housing and Public Works released a discussion paper seeking consultation from industry stakeholders regarding the operational effectiveness of the BCIPA. Following consultation, in May 2013, the final report was published. The key amendments announced by the Queensland Government are the product of the further review of the numerous recommendations contained in the final report.
Proposed regime
The key changes announced include the following:
- a separate set of timescales to apply to any claim that exceeds $750,000, or which is made in respect of a latent condition or a time-related cost. The respondent will have:
- 15 business days to provide a payment schedule (or 30 business days if the claim is served more than 91 days after the reference date in the contract); and
- 15 business days to provide an adjudication response (which can be increased by the adjudicator by up to a further 15 days);
The reforms will generally only apply to contracts entered into after the date the changes take effect (currently proposed as 1 September 2014). However, the reforms relating to the appointment of adjudicators will also apply to contracts entered into before that date.
Commentary
The proposed new regime purports to achieve a more even balance between the interests of claimants and respondents, particularly in relation to larger claims and delay in the making of claims.
Undoubtedly, a layer of complexity would be added to the regime in Queensland, and it is especially important for industry participants to be aware of the new timeframes that may apply in the circumstances.
The reforms also have ramifications at a contractual level, and participants should, in conjunction with the appropriate legal advice, consider what changes will be required to their forms of contract.
Finally, it is worth noting that the proposed changes are still to be debated in the Queensland Parliament, and participants should remain alert both to the possibility of changes to the reforms as proposed and to the effective date any reforms will take effect.